Huwebes, Marso 18, 2010

Dyornalistang binaligtad ang totoo

Dyornalistang binaligtad ang totoo

(Sagot sa kolum ni Horacio "Ducky" Paredes, Abante, Marso 18, 2010, pahina 4)

Kasinungalingan ang kolum ni Horacio Paredes. Ayon sa kanya, nanalo daw ang Buklod sa halalan at talo ang Bisig. Na kabaligtaran! Ito ang pinakalaman ng kanyang kolum. Ito ang angklahan ng lahat ng kanyang argumento laban sa mga welgista.

Sa journalism, ang kauna-unahang rule na dapat sundin ay objectivity of facts. Ibig sabihin, katotohanan lang. At ang facts na nakuha ay bini-verify muna ng ilang beses bago gamitin sa isang sulatin.

Saan kaya nakuha ni Paredes ang datos niya na panalo ang Buklod at talo ang Bisig? Nagresearch ba siya sa mga records ng BLR-DOLE na siyang nagconduct ng C.E.? Kung sana ay sinunod ni Paredes ang basic na itinuturo sa mga paaralan ng dyornalismo, disin sana'y nakita niya sa kanyang pag-iimbistiga na ang nanalo sa nakaraang halalan ay ang Bisig at di ang Buklod.

Pero sa tagal na ni Paredes sa dyornalismo, tinubuan na siya ng tahid dito. Alam na alam niya ang basic rule ng objectivity sa journalism. Pero bakit nagawa niyang baliktarin ang totoo?

Sinlaki ng mundo na question mark ang agad na papasok sa ating isipan kung bakit ang kabaligtaran ng katotohanan ang isinulat ni Paredes. Question mark na tutungo sa pag-iisip agad na nabayaran ng MALAKI ng Goldilocks manedsment itong si Paredes para birahin nang todo ang mga welgista at panigan ang kumpanya.

Pero kahit na ang sagadsaring maka-kapitalista na manunulat ay hindi talamak na isusulat na nanalo ang totoong natalo. Bakit sinabi ni Paredes at ginawang batayan ng lahat ng kanyang argumento na nanalo ang Buklod kahit totoong talo? At hindi ito ang isyu sa welga!

Matanda na kasi si Paredes. Tamad ng mag-isip. Iyan ay natural na tunguhin ng katawan at isip ng tao, depende sa lifestyle at body constitution na minana sa genes ng mga ninuno. Dapat ay nagpapahinga na siya sa tumba-tumba. Kulang pa ba ang naipon niyang payola ng mga kapitalista sa kanyang pagsusulat laban sa mga manggagawa hanggang sa kanyang pinal na pamamahinga?

Pero di yan gagawin ni Paredes. Sapagkat siya ay isa sa mga bangaw sa midya. Ang masmidyang naglilingkod sa mga kapitalista at sistemang kapitalismo. Maglilingkod yan sa mga kapitalista hanggang kamatayan! Gem de Guzman

Miyerkules, Marso 17, 2010

Urgent Appeal - Re: Threat of force on Goldilocks union strike

http://www.tfdp.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=153:philippines-threat-of-breaking-the-labor-union-strike-of-illegally-dismissed-workers-of-goldilocks-by-force-&catid=10:other-campaigns&Itemid=24

Urgent Action Appeal: Threat of breaking the labor union strike of illegally dismissed workers of Goldilocks by force

17 of March, 2010

Dear Friends,

The Task Force Detainees of the Philippines (TFDP) requests your urgent action regarding a threat of breaking the labor union strike set-up by dismissed workers of Goldilocks-one of the largest bakeshops in the country, and to bring about a just solution for the illegal dismissal of 127 workers for conducting and participating in a supposed ‘illegal strike’ which apparently which took place on May 20 and 27, 2008.

BRIEF HISTORY/DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE

On April 16, 2008, The Bukluran ng Independyenteng Samahan na Itinatag sa Goldilocks (BISIG) workers’ union sent a letter to the management requesting the latter to commence the collective bargaining negotiation but the management ignored the said letter request. BISIG filed a Notice of Strike (NOS) dated April 24, 2008 on the issue of discrimination, harassments and other workers’ rights and welfare issues. On May 20, 2008, Goldilocks responded by filing a petition for assumption of jurisdiction or Certification for Compulsory Arbitration for the NOS. DOLE Undersecretary Lourdes Transmonte, then acting Secretary issued a Certificate Order dated May 26, 2008 certifying the labor dispute to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) for compulsory arbitration. The said order was received by BISIG on May 29, 2008.

A Goldilocks representative and BISIG leaders entered into agreement at the National Conciliation And Mediation Board (NCMB) dated June 11, 2008 and agreed to await the intervention of DOLE Office of the Secretary and the Bureau of Labor Relations (BLR) in relation with the labor dispute. In addition, the union hereby withdraws the instant labor dispute for the sake of industrial peace.

On October 13, 2008, BISIG filed NOS this time around the grounds were as follows: 1. Unfair labor practice (Refusal to Bargain Collectively); 2. Illegal Suspension; 3. Unjust transfer of Goldilocks SM Cubao Branch to Provinces; 4. Discrimination (selective P13.00 wage increase); and others. On October 31, 2008, DOLE Secretary Mariano Roque certuified the NOS to a Compulsary Arbitration before the NLRC.

The certified Notice of Strike (NOS) was raffled to NLRC Sixth Division composed of Commissioner Nieves Vivar-de Castro (ponente), Commissioner Benedicto R. Palacol (Presiding Commissioner) and Commissioner Isabel G. Panganiban-Ortiguera.

On May 28, 2009, the NLRC came up with the decision penned by Commissioner Nieves Vivar-de Castro. The decision was promulgated as follows:

1. Ordering Goldilocks to commence collective bargaining negotiation with BUKLOD (another contesting workers’ union)
2. Sustaining the legality of the penalty of suspension on Wilson Dy and six other officers, leaders and members of BISIG-AGLO.
3. Declaring Joel Lachica (of BISIG) and four (4) others to have been validly dismissed from employment
4. Declaring the demonstration and picketing of more than 120 workers and employees after office hours and eight hours work conducted on May 20 and 27, 2008 to be illegal strike and imposing the following penalties:
a. For having participated in the illegal strikes, the 17 Union officers and Board members are deemed to have lost their employment.
b. For having committed illegal activities during illegal strikes, the one hundred four (104) Union members are deemed terminated from employment.
c. Ordering Goldilocks to grant financial assistance to the terminated Union members only in an amount equivalent to half month pay per year of service as a measure of social justice.

Mr. Teodorico Navea of the Bukluran ng Manggagawang Pilipino (BMP) labor center said that the decision negates the existence of the duly certified bargaining agent which is BISIG. He also laments the outright non recognition of the violations incurred by the Goldilocks Management. Furthermore, the decision affirms the management not guilty of any unfair labor practice well in fact the workers has a thorough documentation of company’s violations according to Navea.

Also, the workers noticed that a copy of the decision was only hand carried by an NLRC employee to the office of Miralles and Associates Law Office (lawyers of BISIG), a far cry from the NLRC tradition where decisions are being sent thru registered mail.

Another unjust decision made was on the case of illegal strike. The workers asked, to where did the NLRC found an illegal strike when no strike ever took place. Indeed, there were 3 attempts on the NOS but all these were assumed jurisdiction by the Office of the Secretary thereby averting the supposed strike to take place. They said that they only exercised their protest during break time hours and with that it did not constitute an illegal strike.

On February 8, 2010, the NLRC reaffirmed the dismissal of the 127 union members of the BISIG Labor Union. This time, the decision focused on the illegality of the strike (which never took place) that became the basis of the dismissal.

The dismissed workers push through their protest and currently holding a strike infront of the Goldilocks plant in Shaw Boulevard, Mandaluyong City. According to them, the management is planning to break the union strike by force any time soon.

SUGGESTED ACTION

Please write letters to the concerned authorities below to:

1. Call their attention to uphold workers' Constitutional right to organize, collective bargaining and negotiations and peaceful concerted activities, including the right to strike in accordance with law;
2. Remind the National Labor Relations (NLRC) of the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) in their obligation to settle disputes between workers and employers including conciliation, and enforce mutual compliance to foster industrial peace.
3. Remind the authorities that forced dispersals of peaceful protest actions carried out without legal and other protections, are prohibited under domestic and international law.

Please urge the Philippine government by sending an appeal letter, e-mail or fax to the following addresses:
H.E. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, President of the Republic, New Executive Building, Malacañang Palace, JP Laurel St., San Miguel, Manila 1005, Philippines. Fax: +632 736 10 10, Tel: +632 735 62 01 / 564 14 51 to 80; E-mail: corres@op.gov.ph / opnet@ops.gov.ph
Hon. Leila De Lima, Chairperson, Commission on Human Rights, SAAC Bldg., UP Complex, Commonwealth Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines . Fax: +632 929 0102. Email: atty_delima@yahoo.com.ph
Hon. Marianito D. Roque, Secretary, Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE), 7th Floor, DOLE Building, Intramuros, 1002 Manila, Philippines, Tel: +632 908 2917 loc. 701, 703, 704, 706, 707. osec@dole.gov.ph
Hon. Gerardo Benjamin C. Nograles, Chairman and Presiding Commissioner, National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), 8/F PPSTA Bldg. IV, Banawe, Quezon City, Philippines. Tel: +362 740 7729
Police Director General Eduardo Versoza, Chief, Philippine National Police, National Headquarters, Camp Crame, EDSA, Quezon City, Philippines. Tel: +632 9116213. Fax: +632 7248763

Contact Organization:

Task Force Detainees of the Philippines (TFDP)
45 St. Mary Street, Cubao, Quezon City 1109, Philippines
telephone: (632) 4378054 / facsimile: (632) 9113643
email: tfdp1974@yahoo.com
website: www.tfdp.net

Apela sa Media mula sa Manggagawa ng Goldilocks

PAHAYAG
Marso 17, 2010

APELA sa MEDIA
mula sa Manggagawa ng Goldilocks


Kami po ay nakikusap sa mga myembro ng mass media na bigyan ng ispasyo ang posisyon ng unyon (BISIG-AGLO-BMP) sa nagaganap na labor dispute sa Goldilocks. Wala po kaming kapasidad na magpalathala sa mga pahayagan gaya ng paid-ad na inilabas ng Management sa Inquirer (PDI, March 16, A17).

Subalit - sa diwa ng kalayaan sa pamamahayag at balansyadong pag-uulat - umaasa kaming mapapagbigyan ang aming kahilingang marinig ng taumbayan ang aming panig, laluna ng mga tagatangkilik ng Goldilocks.

Humihingi kami ng pag-unawa sa mga regular na tagatangkilik ng Goldilocks. Kung walang suplay ng inyong mga paboritong produkto sa aming mga outlet, ito ay ibinunsod ng welga sa dalawang planta ng Goldilocks sa Mandaluyong simula noong Marso 11, 2010.

Hindi kami nagwelga para lamang guluhin ang operasyon ng Goldilocks tulad ng nais palabasin ng Management. Welga ang aming “huling opsyon” para matigil ang tanggalan sa pabrika na may layong (1) durugin ang unyong BISIG, at (2) palitan ang mga regular ng mas mura at mas maamong kontraktwal na empleyado.

Nagpasya kaming tumigil sa pagtatrabaho na isinasakripisyo ang sweldo na pambili ng arawang pagkain ng aming mga anak - sa layong ibalik sa trabaho ang 127 manggagawa na tinanggal ng kompanya noong Pebrero 8, 2010.

Ang mga tinanggal ay mga lider at aktibong kasapi ng aming unyon. Dahil dito, maliwanag para sa amin na ang tanggalang naganap ay iligal. Ito ay union busting. Isang unfair labor practice, na pinarurusahan ng batas at isa sa mga ligal na dahilan ng isang strike, ayon mismo sa ating Labor Code.

Ayon sa management, tinanggal daw ang mga manggagawa dahil sa patuloy na paglulunsad ng mga protesta sa harap ng mga planta ng Goldilocks na diumano'y “may pwersahang pagpigil sa mga delivery at pagharang sa mga empleyado na pumasok sa trabaho” (PDI, A17, 3/16/2010). Ito ay pawang kasinungalingan!

Bagamat hindi kami abogado. Alam namin ang aming karapatan. Nag-aral din kami ng Labor Code. Naglunsad kami ng “moving pickets” sa pagsapraktika ng Konstitusyunal na karapatan sa peaceful assembly upang ipahayag ang aming grievances sa kumpanya. Hindi namin hinarang ang malayang pagpasok at paglabas ng produkto dahil ito ay pagsagka sa “free ingress and egress”, na iligal sa timbangan ng batas.

Hindi biro ang magdesisyong magwelga. Pero nilubos na ng "lantay" na prosesong ligal o simpleng "labanang papel sa korte" ang aming pasensya kundi pati ang kumakalam na mga sikmura ng 127 manggagawang tinanggal sa trabaho. Humarap pa kami sa dalawang hearing ng NCMB (National Conciliation and Mediation Board) noong Pebrero 23 at 24. Subalit nagtetengang-kawali pa din ang Management.

Sabi ng Management, ang mga manggagawa raw ay tinanggal sa bisa ng naunang desisyon ng National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) noong Mayo 2009 (halos isang taon na ang nakaraan). Gusto nilang ipakitang sila ang nagmamagandang-loob dahil hindi nila kaagad na tinanggal ang mga manggagawa. Pero ito ay hindi kusang-loob kundi inobliga ng apela ng unyon (Motion for Reconsideration) sa NLRC.

Pero nang ipinagkait ng NLRC ang aming mosyon - at inangkas sa kaso ang gawa-gawang iligal strike, ibig sabihin, itinuring na welga ang aming “moving picket” - nagpasya kaming hindi na iapela ang desisyon ng NLRC sa Court Appeals hanggang sa Supreme Court. Sa kabila ng aming solidong posisyon, hindi kami kinatigan ng NLRC. Natutukso kaming magduda na ang Komisyon ay may “komisyon” mula sa Goldilocks Management.

Inasahan na namin ang ganitong desisyon ng NLRC. Kaya naman naobliga kaming pumili sa dalawang ligal na larangan: (a) ang pag-apela sa Court of Appeals hanggang sa Supreme Court, o (b) ang paglulunsad ng welga - na ginagarantiyahan ng Konstitusyon at ng Labor Code of the Philippines.

Sa dalawang opsyon, ang pinakamadali ay ang pag-apela sa Korte. Subalit mas matagal ang paghihintay ng resolusyon. Hindi ito ang pinili namin. Sapagkat inaasahan namin ang tuloy-tuloy pang pagtatanggal ng mga trabahador ng Goldilocks Management para makatipid sa labor costs at durugin ang BISIG-AGLO-BMP.

Mas komplikado at mas mahirap ang landas ng pagwewelga. Pero mas dito matitiyak namin ang tagumpay sa aming mga kahilingan sapagkat ang kinakailangan lamang tiyakin ay ang pagsuporta ng mga manggagawa upang matigil ang operasyon.

Mga kababayan! Hinihingi namin ang inyong simpatya't pag-unawa. Prayoridad din namin ang mga tagapagtangkilik ng Goldilocks. Pero hindi naman kalabisang ikunsidera namin ang aming sariling kapakanan - ang kasigurahan sa trabaho at karapatang mag-unyon at makipag-CBA na amin ding mga Konstitusyunal na karapatan.

Kung inyo pong mamarapatin, hiling namin na pansamantalang huwag tangkilikin ang Goldilocks upang maobliga ang Management na ibalik sa trabaho ang 127 manggagawa. Lalupa't pinangangambahan naming gagamit ito ng dahas laban sa aming welga. Hindi na bago ang ganitong ganting reaksyon ng Goldilocks Management. Sa welgang hinarap nito noong 1991, tatlong unyonista ang namatay at 6 ang sugatan nang paulanan ng bala ang picket line.

Pagpalain nawa tayo ng Poong Maykapal. Mabuhay ang uring manggagawa at sambayanang Pilipino!

Biyernes, Marso 12, 2010

Business Mirror News - Goldilocks’ workers strike over dismissal of 127 personnel

http://businessmirror.com.ph/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&catid=33%3Aeconomy&id=22906%3Agoldilocks-workers-strike-over-dismissal-of-127-personnel-&Itemid=60

Goldilocks’ workers strike over dismissal of 127 personnel
Written by Dennis Estopace / Reporter, BUSINESS MIRROR
Friday, 12 March 2010 20:29

THE strained voice of union leader Butch Peña revealed the tension that clutched some 200 Goldilocks Bakeshop Inc. workers on strike at the company’s cake and food plant in Mandaluyong as they faced off some 30 policemen and a fire truck.

The face-off began after the workers staged a strike beginning 3 a.m. on Thursday at the two plants of the bakery and food manufacturer.

“We’re under a lot of pressure here. But we’ll defend the picket line as much as we can,” Peña told the BusinessMirror.

Peña said there are also a hundred workers at the company’s plant in Sta. Mesa, Manila, but who have been relatively out of the radar of the police as of press time. He explained they staged a strike after the company dismissed some 127 workers last month.

“The conciliatory negotiations collapsed,” Peña said in the vernacular, adding that the union suspected the dismissal of fellow workers begins the company’s move to hire contractual labor.

According to documents from the union Bukluran ng Independenteng Samahan na Itinatag sa Goldilocks (Bisig), the company requested the labor department that the recent and third notice of strike filed by Bisig be converted into preventive mediation.

“Part of their [management’s] manifestation states that ‘the management instructed the affected employees and victims of illegal mass dismissal to attend the livelihood seminar at the company’s office in Pacific Building in Ortigas instead of reporting for work at the plant in Shaw Boulevard.’”

The BusinessMirror called Goldilocks’ office but was only answered by an employee from the accounting department who said they were ordered to go home after lunch.

The two telephone numbers listed in the company’s report to the Securities and Exchange Commission also rang but no one answered.

Huwebes, Marso 11, 2010

Bukas na Liham sa Lahat ng Tagatangkilik ng Goldilocks

BUKAS NA LIHAM SA LAHAT NG TAGATANGKILIK NG GOLDILOCKS
(Sagot sa inilathala ng Goldilocks Company sa Philippine Daily Inquirer, Marso 16, 2010)

Marso 16, 2010


Mga kababayan,

Pagbati sa inyong lahat!

Marahil di na kaila sa inyo ang nagaganap na sigalot sa pagitan ng mga manggagawa ng Goldilocks at ang mga nagmamay-ari nito. Obligadong ipaliwanag namin ang mga totoong pangyayari kung bakit humantong sa pagwewelga ang manggagawa noong Marso 11, 2010.

Hindi biro ang limang taong pagpupunyagi ng mga manggagawa ng Goldilocks na magkaroon ng isang tunay na unyon sa kompanya. Dito po nagsimula ang pinakaugat na problema. Ang mga kaganapan nitong huling dalawang taon ay nagpapatunay lamang ng tunay na kulay ng may-ari, ang pagiging gahaman nito sa tubo at paggamit mismo ng batas upang yurakan ang mga karapatan ng mga manggagawa at pairalin ang kapangyarihan sa pamamagitan ng salapi.

Kung totoong desperado ang mga manggagawang hindi makipagkaisa at maging wala sa katwiran ay dapat noong 2006 pa lang ay lumikha na siya ng kaguluhan. Bago pumutok ang welga nitong Marso 2010, may dalawang magkasunod na “NOS” (Notice of Strike) ang naisampa pero di ito itinuloy dahil pumasok sa proseso ng konsilyasyon ang mga manggagawa. Ang nagtulak sa manggagawa na gawin ang pag-aaklas ay nang isakatuparan ng kompanya ng Goldilocks ang iligal na pagtatanggal sa may 127 na manggagawa noong Pebrero 8, 2010. Hindi na pinapasok sa kompanya ang mga nasabing mga manggagawa. Sa katunayan, napilitang magpiket ang mga tinanggal na manggagawa nang sumunod na mga araw. Iligal ang ginawa ng kompanya dahil matapos matanggap ang kautusan ng NLRC kaugnay sa dismissal ay agarang ipinatupad ng management ng wala pang “entry of judgment” na siyang marapat na proseso bago ipatupad ang pagtatanggal. Kabalintunaan ang pahayag ng kompanya na ang manggagawa pa ngayon ang may kasalanan na hindi nagsampa ng apila sa korte. Para saan pa ang apila sa korte na ang kautusan ay agaran nang ipinatupad.

Anila, “binigyan daw nila ng “ample time“ ang mga manggagawa para mag-apila. Pero ang katotohanan ay di nila binigyan ng “ample time” ang mga manggagawa bago ipatupad ang ginawang pagtatanggal.

Ang nakakalungkot sa ahensiya ng ating gobyerno tulad ng DOLE at NLRC, imbes kastiguhin nila ang kompanya dahil sa pambabalasubas nito sa manggagawa ay sila pa itong numero unong konsintidor at naglalabas ng mga disisyong pumapabor lamang sa mga kapitalista. Sa naging disisyon ng NLRC noong 2009, kwestyunable at nakakapagduda ang nilalaman nito; Una, pagpapatibay na walang unfair labor practice na nilabag ang Goldilocks Management, Ikalawa, binigyan ng karapatan ang natalong unyon sa Goldilocks na siyang maki-pagCBA at panghuli ay ang pag-aangat sa picket protest bilang illegal strike na batayan sa pagtatanggal sa mga manggagawa. Ang desisyong ito ay inapela ng mga manggagawa pero ito’y binastos ng management at dagliang ipinatupad. Sa katunayan, ang kompanya ay nakipag-CBA sa natalong unyon.

Kahit nakawelga, ang mga opisyales ay bukas sa pakikipag-usap. Pero likas ang katusuhan ng Kompanya. Sinasabi nila na hindi daw sila nagtanggal at gumawa ng buhol-buhol na kasinungalingan para mapagtakpan ang iligal na ginawa sa DOLE.

Sa kasaysayan ng Goldilocks sa loob ng apatnapung (40) taon, 2 matitingkad na pangyayari ang magpapatunay kung anong klaseng kompanya ito. 3 manggagawa ang pinatay sa piketlayn at anim ang nasugatan bunsod ng unang welga noong 1991. Gayundin noong 2004, hindi nabago ang ginawang nitong pagtatanggal sa mga manggagawa dahil sa panahong yon pitumpung (70) tagaluto ang kanilang iligal na tinanggal.

Mahaba na po ang sakripisyo naming mga manggagawa sa Goldilocks. Apatnapung taon naming itinaguyod upang abutin nito ang mahigit sa dalawang daang (200) puwesto sa buong kapuluan at maging sa labas ng bansa. Pero ano itong ginagawa ng Goldilocks? Lalo nitong pinalalakas ang tubo habang ang mga manggagawa nito ay pinagkakaitang mabuhay ng disente. Layon ng pagtatanggal ay mapalitan ng mga kontraktwal ang kasalukuyang manggagawa ng Goldilocks upang makatipid sa gastusin sa pasahod at benepisyo at lalo pang kumita ng limpak-limpak ang kompanya.

Mga kababayan, kami ay walang kakayanang magpa-paid ad sa mga malaganap na pahayagan, ang sa amin ay ang pagyakap sa katotohanan. Hindi namin kayang baluktutin ang batas at lalong wala kaming kakayanang manuhol ng mga tiwaling opisyal ng gobyerno. Kami ay naghahangad lamang na mabuhay ng marangal, may dignidad at karapatan.

Tatagal pa ang aming laban at ngayon pa lamang ay nagpapasalamat na kami sa lahat ng aming tagasuporta di lamang dito sa ating bansa maging sa ibayong dagat. Natutuwa kami sa mga tugon mula sa iba’t ibang sektor lalung lalo na sa mga kapwa unyon. Sa mga maralita at iba pang uring anakpawis. Sa mga panggitnang puwersa na karamihan ay nagbibigay inspirasyon sa amin sa pamamagitan ng internet, sa partikular sa facebook at friendster. Lahat kayo ay aming ipinagkakapuri dahil nanawagan kayo ng aming pagbabalik sa trabaho at mabigyang hustisya ang kalagayan naming mga manggagawa.

Ituloy po natin ang pansamantalang di pagtangkilik sa Goldilocks hangga’t di kami naibabalik sa aming trabaho!

Muli ang aming marubdob na pagpapasalamat,


127 iligal na tinanggal na manggagawa ng Goldilocks
BISIG-AGLO-BMP

Dismissal of 127 Goldilocks Workers Assailed

“Goldilocks tumitiba, Manggagawa kinakawawa!”

Dear Friends,

Today February 9, 2010, 127 workers were refused entry by the Goldilocks management. The workers were informed yesterday regarding the latest decision of the NLRC (National Labor Relations Commission) affirming their dismissal.

In turn, the workers staged a picket outside the Goldilocks Plant in Mandaluyong to protest and condemn the unjust decision.

Four years ago, the workers participated in a PCE (Petition for Certification Elections) held in February 28, 2006 as a result of the sixty (60) days freedom period after the 5-year Collective Bargaining agreement covering March 1, 2001 to February 28, 2006 between Goldilocks Bakeshop Inc., and Buklod ng mga Manggagawa sa Goldilocks Bakeshop (BUKLOD) expired. Separate petitions were filed by three groups, namely; KMG-KMM-Katipunan (Kilusan ng mga Manggagawa sa Goldilocks-Kilusan ng mga Manggagawang Makabayan), Bukluran ng Independyenteng Samahan na Itinatag sa Goldilocks (BISIG) and Obrero Pilipino-Goldilocks Employees Association (Obrero-GOLDEA).Being the incumbent union, BUKLOD was considered as forced intervenor for being the incumbent union.

It was a rough sailing for the workers since the management in collusion with the incumbent union (BUKLOD) questioned the petition filed by Obrero-GOLDEA. On the other hand, BUKLOD, filed a petition to cancel BISIG’s certificate of registration.

On May 10, 2006, DOLE-NCR Med-Arbiter Catherine Z. Licaros issued an order directing the conduct of certification of election. In response to the decision, both BUKLOD and Obrero appealed the decision and argued that BISIG and KMG-KMM-Katipunan should be excluded as among the choices in the certification election.

But a resolution was released in September 11, 2006 issued by Undersecretary Luzviminda Padilla dismissing the appeal. Subsequently, an entry of judgment was issued on November 14, 2006 by the Bureau of Labor Relations (BLR) Director Rebecca Chato. The Certification election was finally conducted on March 19, 2007 with the following results;

KMG-KMM-Katipunan---------334
BISIG--------------------------517
OBRERO------------------------44
BUKLOD-----------------------581
NO UNION----------------------15
__________________________
TOTAL 1491

Because no union garnered the fifty percent plus one (50% plus 1) ruling in the certification election between BUKLOD and BISIG and after hearings on the manifestation, run-off election was scheduled on August 6, 2007 and the result was;

BISIG--------------------------------- 764
BUKLOD------------------------------653
Spoiled----------------------------------38
Segregated/Challenged Votes----------202
____________________________
Total Votes: 1,657

Buklod filed a protest in the run-off election and manifested that the segregated ballot must be counted.

On March 17, 2008, seven months later, BISIG was certified as the sole and exclusive bargaining representative of rank and file employees thru the decision issued by Med-Arbiter Atty. Alma Magdaraog-Alma. The decision was appealed by BUKLOD before the office of the Secretary;

Surprisingly on April 10, 2008, the Court of Appeal reinstated the August 11, 2006 Resolution of the then Bureau of Labor Relation OIC-Director Henry Parel delisting BISIG from the rooster of legitimate labor organizations. BISIG in turn, immediately filed a motion for reconsideration.

On April 16, 2008, BISIG sent a letter to the Goldilocks Management requesting the latter to commence the collective bargaining negotiation but the management ignored the said letter request. BISIG filed a (NOS) Notice of Strike on April 24, 2008 on the issue of discrimination, harassments and other related issues.

On May 20,2008, the Goldilocks company responded by filing a petition for assumption jurisdiction or Certification for Compulsory Arbitration for the (NOS) Notice of Strike of BISIG dated April 24, 2008. Undersecretary Lourdes Transmonte, then acting Secretary issued a Certificate Order dated May 26, 2008 certifying the labor dispute to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) for compulsory arbitration. The said order was received by BISIG on May 29, 2008.

The conciliation before the NCMB (National Conciliation And Mediation Board, both the Goldilocks Bakeshop Inc representative and BISIG leaders entered into agreement dated June 11, 2008 and agreed to await the office of the (BLR)- Office of the Sec (Osec) will undertake in conjunction with the labor dispute at bench specifically, the issue on Certification election. Additionally, the Union hereby withdraws the instant labor dispute for the sake of industrial peace”.

Days earlier prior to conciliation, BISIG affiliated to AGLO (Association of Genuine Labor Organization) and on June 12, 2008, the Department of Labor and Employment-National Capital Region (DOLE-NCR) issued Certificate of Creation of Local Chapter with Certification No PFC-028-2008-CC.

On June 16, 2008, BISIG filed its manifestation with motion to dismiss before the NLRC, praying that the certified case be dismissed in view of BISIG’s withdrawal of its Notice of Strike dated April 24, 2008.

On July 1, 2008, BISIG filed another NOS (Notice of Strike) on the following grounds; 1.Unfair labor practice, 2. Union Busting and other related cases.

On July 8, 2008, Undersecretary Romeo Lagman, by authority of the Secretary, issued a Resolution affirming BISIG’s certification as an exclusive bargaining representative of Goldilocks Bakeshop Inc., rank and file workers and employees.

On July 11, 2008, the management filed its Manifestation with Motion to Subsume before the Office of DOLE Secretary.

On October 13, 2008, three months later, BISIG filed its third Notice of Strike, this time around the grounds were as follows; 1. Unfair labor practice (Refusal to Bargain Collectively) 2. Illegal Suspension, 3. Unjust transfer of Goldilocks SM Cubao Branch to Provinces, 4. Discrimination (selective P13.00 wage increase) and others.

On October 31, 2008, DOLE Secretary Mariano Roque certified the October 13, 2008 BISIG Notice of Strike to Compulsory Arbitration before the NLRC;

The certified Notice of Strike (NOS) was raffled to NLRC Sixth Division composed of Commissioner Nieves Vivar-de Castro (ponente), Commissioner Benedicto R. Palacol (Presiding Commissioner) and Commissioner Isabel G. Panganiban-Ortiguera.

On May 28, 2009, almost seven months later, the NLRC came up with the decision penned by Commissioner Nieves Vivar-de Castro on the issues contained in the Notice of Strike. The decision was promulgated as follows;

1. Ordering Goldilocks to commence collective bargaining negotiation with BUKLOD (the losing union in the certification election)- this is a blatant disregard of what is the rule of law negating the existence of a duly certified bargaining agent, the BISIG-AGLO.
2. Sustaining the legality of the penalty of suspension on Wilson Dy and six other officers, leaders and members of BISIG-AGLO.- this is an outright non recognition of the violations incurred by the Goldilocks Management.
3. Declaring Joel Lachica and four (4) others to have been validly dismissed from employment- affirming the Management not guilty of unfair labor practice.
4. Declaring the demonstration and picketing of more than 120 workers and employees after office hours and eight hours work conducted on May 20 and 27, 2008 to be illegal strike and imposing the following penalties;
a. For having participated in the illegal strikes, the 17 Union officers and Board members are deemed to have lost their employment.
b. For having committed illegal activities during illegal strikes, the one hundred four (104) Union members are deemed terminated from employment.
c. Ordering Goldilocks to grant financial assistance to the terminated Union members only in an amount equivalent to half month pay per year of service as a measure of social justice.

The decision that was promulgated was unusually hand carried by an NLRC employee a day after the promulgation effected last May 27, 2009 to the office of Miralles and Associates Law Office, a far cry from the NLRC tradition where decisions are being sent thru registered mail.

Another questionable decision made was on the case of illegal strike. To where did the NLRC apply an illegal strike when no strike ever took place. Indeed, there were 3 attempts on the Notices of Strike but all these were assumed jurisdiction by the office of the Secretary thereby averting the supposed strike to take place. Only in the Philippines where you exercise your freedom to picket during break time but now constitute as an illegal strike. A “brilliant” decision penned by an equally brilliant commissioner in the person of Commissioner Nieves De Castro.

Yesterday, February 8, 2010, for over eight months now, the NLRC gave its final blow and reaffirmed the dismissal of the 127 union members of the BISIG Labor Union. This time, the decision focused on the illegality of the strike that became the basis of the dismissal. A strike that never took place.

2010 would be a bleak picture for the 127 families of Goldilocks workers and employees. This is the grim reality of our previous slogan, “Goldilocks tumitiba, Manggagawa kinakawawa”. We want to let the whole world know that the Goldilocks Company continues to grow but not their workers.

Our plight is totally unthinkable, the rule of law applies only to those who have power and money and not to people like ours. In our case, there’s no truth on the saying that for those who have less in life should enjoy more in law.

We are deeply saddened of our situation and to our family, our children and our future. There are companies in the Philippines like Goldilocks. We don’t want our case to become a precedent that would be detrimental to other workers and their families.

Please join us in our crusade to fight not only to ourselves but to the Filipino workers. We welcome your support in our struggle. We still do not lose hope. We will continue our fight in all fronts. In turn, we are seeking your support in whatever way you can. These are the ways where you can be of help;

1. Giving material and financial support to our campaign. (We will later provide details of our bank account)
2. You should think twice eating in Goldilocks branches/outlets. The more you patronize the more you support greedy capitalists.
3. Inform all your relatives, friends here in the Philippines and abroad not to patronize anymore Goldilocks. Always remember our slogan, “Goldilocks tumitiba, Manggagawa kinakawawa”.
4. If you cannot avoid eating in their outlets, at least minimize your patronage.
5. Petition all scrupulous and corrupt government officials in the mold of Commissioners De Castro, Ortiguera and Palacol.
6. Support and join our protest activities.
7. Write protest letters to DOLE, NLRC and related government offices and institution and to the Goldilocks management through their branches and offices. You can directly mail your letter or personally deliver your letter to Goldilocks outlets/branches.
8. Propagate our issue and enjoin everyone to become supporters of Goldilocks workers.


In the pursuit of justice for the Filipino workers,

127 dismissed Goldilocks workers and employees