Miyerkules, Marso 17, 2010

Urgent Appeal - Re: Threat of force on Goldilocks union strike

http://www.tfdp.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=153:philippines-threat-of-breaking-the-labor-union-strike-of-illegally-dismissed-workers-of-goldilocks-by-force-&catid=10:other-campaigns&Itemid=24

Urgent Action Appeal: Threat of breaking the labor union strike of illegally dismissed workers of Goldilocks by force

17 of March, 2010

Dear Friends,

The Task Force Detainees of the Philippines (TFDP) requests your urgent action regarding a threat of breaking the labor union strike set-up by dismissed workers of Goldilocks-one of the largest bakeshops in the country, and to bring about a just solution for the illegal dismissal of 127 workers for conducting and participating in a supposed ‘illegal strike’ which apparently which took place on May 20 and 27, 2008.

BRIEF HISTORY/DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE

On April 16, 2008, The Bukluran ng Independyenteng Samahan na Itinatag sa Goldilocks (BISIG) workers’ union sent a letter to the management requesting the latter to commence the collective bargaining negotiation but the management ignored the said letter request. BISIG filed a Notice of Strike (NOS) dated April 24, 2008 on the issue of discrimination, harassments and other workers’ rights and welfare issues. On May 20, 2008, Goldilocks responded by filing a petition for assumption of jurisdiction or Certification for Compulsory Arbitration for the NOS. DOLE Undersecretary Lourdes Transmonte, then acting Secretary issued a Certificate Order dated May 26, 2008 certifying the labor dispute to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) for compulsory arbitration. The said order was received by BISIG on May 29, 2008.

A Goldilocks representative and BISIG leaders entered into agreement at the National Conciliation And Mediation Board (NCMB) dated June 11, 2008 and agreed to await the intervention of DOLE Office of the Secretary and the Bureau of Labor Relations (BLR) in relation with the labor dispute. In addition, the union hereby withdraws the instant labor dispute for the sake of industrial peace.

On October 13, 2008, BISIG filed NOS this time around the grounds were as follows: 1. Unfair labor practice (Refusal to Bargain Collectively); 2. Illegal Suspension; 3. Unjust transfer of Goldilocks SM Cubao Branch to Provinces; 4. Discrimination (selective P13.00 wage increase); and others. On October 31, 2008, DOLE Secretary Mariano Roque certuified the NOS to a Compulsary Arbitration before the NLRC.

The certified Notice of Strike (NOS) was raffled to NLRC Sixth Division composed of Commissioner Nieves Vivar-de Castro (ponente), Commissioner Benedicto R. Palacol (Presiding Commissioner) and Commissioner Isabel G. Panganiban-Ortiguera.

On May 28, 2009, the NLRC came up with the decision penned by Commissioner Nieves Vivar-de Castro. The decision was promulgated as follows:

1. Ordering Goldilocks to commence collective bargaining negotiation with BUKLOD (another contesting workers’ union)
2. Sustaining the legality of the penalty of suspension on Wilson Dy and six other officers, leaders and members of BISIG-AGLO.
3. Declaring Joel Lachica (of BISIG) and four (4) others to have been validly dismissed from employment
4. Declaring the demonstration and picketing of more than 120 workers and employees after office hours and eight hours work conducted on May 20 and 27, 2008 to be illegal strike and imposing the following penalties:
a. For having participated in the illegal strikes, the 17 Union officers and Board members are deemed to have lost their employment.
b. For having committed illegal activities during illegal strikes, the one hundred four (104) Union members are deemed terminated from employment.
c. Ordering Goldilocks to grant financial assistance to the terminated Union members only in an amount equivalent to half month pay per year of service as a measure of social justice.

Mr. Teodorico Navea of the Bukluran ng Manggagawang Pilipino (BMP) labor center said that the decision negates the existence of the duly certified bargaining agent which is BISIG. He also laments the outright non recognition of the violations incurred by the Goldilocks Management. Furthermore, the decision affirms the management not guilty of any unfair labor practice well in fact the workers has a thorough documentation of company’s violations according to Navea.

Also, the workers noticed that a copy of the decision was only hand carried by an NLRC employee to the office of Miralles and Associates Law Office (lawyers of BISIG), a far cry from the NLRC tradition where decisions are being sent thru registered mail.

Another unjust decision made was on the case of illegal strike. The workers asked, to where did the NLRC found an illegal strike when no strike ever took place. Indeed, there were 3 attempts on the NOS but all these were assumed jurisdiction by the Office of the Secretary thereby averting the supposed strike to take place. They said that they only exercised their protest during break time hours and with that it did not constitute an illegal strike.

On February 8, 2010, the NLRC reaffirmed the dismissal of the 127 union members of the BISIG Labor Union. This time, the decision focused on the illegality of the strike (which never took place) that became the basis of the dismissal.

The dismissed workers push through their protest and currently holding a strike infront of the Goldilocks plant in Shaw Boulevard, Mandaluyong City. According to them, the management is planning to break the union strike by force any time soon.

SUGGESTED ACTION

Please write letters to the concerned authorities below to:

1. Call their attention to uphold workers' Constitutional right to organize, collective bargaining and negotiations and peaceful concerted activities, including the right to strike in accordance with law;
2. Remind the National Labor Relations (NLRC) of the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) in their obligation to settle disputes between workers and employers including conciliation, and enforce mutual compliance to foster industrial peace.
3. Remind the authorities that forced dispersals of peaceful protest actions carried out without legal and other protections, are prohibited under domestic and international law.

Please urge the Philippine government by sending an appeal letter, e-mail or fax to the following addresses:
H.E. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, President of the Republic, New Executive Building, MalacaƱang Palace, JP Laurel St., San Miguel, Manila 1005, Philippines. Fax: +632 736 10 10, Tel: +632 735 62 01 / 564 14 51 to 80; E-mail: corres@op.gov.ph / opnet@ops.gov.ph
Hon. Leila De Lima, Chairperson, Commission on Human Rights, SAAC Bldg., UP Complex, Commonwealth Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines . Fax: +632 929 0102. Email: atty_delima@yahoo.com.ph
Hon. Marianito D. Roque, Secretary, Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE), 7th Floor, DOLE Building, Intramuros, 1002 Manila, Philippines, Tel: +632 908 2917 loc. 701, 703, 704, 706, 707. osec@dole.gov.ph
Hon. Gerardo Benjamin C. Nograles, Chairman and Presiding Commissioner, National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), 8/F PPSTA Bldg. IV, Banawe, Quezon City, Philippines. Tel: +362 740 7729
Police Director General Eduardo Versoza, Chief, Philippine National Police, National Headquarters, Camp Crame, EDSA, Quezon City, Philippines. Tel: +632 9116213. Fax: +632 7248763

Contact Organization:

Task Force Detainees of the Philippines (TFDP)
45 St. Mary Street, Cubao, Quezon City 1109, Philippines
telephone: (632) 4378054 / facsimile: (632) 9113643
email: tfdp1974@yahoo.com
website: www.tfdp.net

Apela sa Media mula sa Manggagawa ng Goldilocks

PAHAYAG
Marso 17, 2010

APELA sa MEDIA
mula sa Manggagawa ng Goldilocks


Kami po ay nakikusap sa mga myembro ng mass media na bigyan ng ispasyo ang posisyon ng unyon (BISIG-AGLO-BMP) sa nagaganap na labor dispute sa Goldilocks. Wala po kaming kapasidad na magpalathala sa mga pahayagan gaya ng paid-ad na inilabas ng Management sa Inquirer (PDI, March 16, A17).

Subalit - sa diwa ng kalayaan sa pamamahayag at balansyadong pag-uulat - umaasa kaming mapapagbigyan ang aming kahilingang marinig ng taumbayan ang aming panig, laluna ng mga tagatangkilik ng Goldilocks.

Humihingi kami ng pag-unawa sa mga regular na tagatangkilik ng Goldilocks. Kung walang suplay ng inyong mga paboritong produkto sa aming mga outlet, ito ay ibinunsod ng welga sa dalawang planta ng Goldilocks sa Mandaluyong simula noong Marso 11, 2010.

Hindi kami nagwelga para lamang guluhin ang operasyon ng Goldilocks tulad ng nais palabasin ng Management. Welga ang aming “huling opsyon” para matigil ang tanggalan sa pabrika na may layong (1) durugin ang unyong BISIG, at (2) palitan ang mga regular ng mas mura at mas maamong kontraktwal na empleyado.

Nagpasya kaming tumigil sa pagtatrabaho na isinasakripisyo ang sweldo na pambili ng arawang pagkain ng aming mga anak - sa layong ibalik sa trabaho ang 127 manggagawa na tinanggal ng kompanya noong Pebrero 8, 2010.

Ang mga tinanggal ay mga lider at aktibong kasapi ng aming unyon. Dahil dito, maliwanag para sa amin na ang tanggalang naganap ay iligal. Ito ay union busting. Isang unfair labor practice, na pinarurusahan ng batas at isa sa mga ligal na dahilan ng isang strike, ayon mismo sa ating Labor Code.

Ayon sa management, tinanggal daw ang mga manggagawa dahil sa patuloy na paglulunsad ng mga protesta sa harap ng mga planta ng Goldilocks na diumano'y “may pwersahang pagpigil sa mga delivery at pagharang sa mga empleyado na pumasok sa trabaho” (PDI, A17, 3/16/2010). Ito ay pawang kasinungalingan!

Bagamat hindi kami abogado. Alam namin ang aming karapatan. Nag-aral din kami ng Labor Code. Naglunsad kami ng “moving pickets” sa pagsapraktika ng Konstitusyunal na karapatan sa peaceful assembly upang ipahayag ang aming grievances sa kumpanya. Hindi namin hinarang ang malayang pagpasok at paglabas ng produkto dahil ito ay pagsagka sa “free ingress and egress”, na iligal sa timbangan ng batas.

Hindi biro ang magdesisyong magwelga. Pero nilubos na ng "lantay" na prosesong ligal o simpleng "labanang papel sa korte" ang aming pasensya kundi pati ang kumakalam na mga sikmura ng 127 manggagawang tinanggal sa trabaho. Humarap pa kami sa dalawang hearing ng NCMB (National Conciliation and Mediation Board) noong Pebrero 23 at 24. Subalit nagtetengang-kawali pa din ang Management.

Sabi ng Management, ang mga manggagawa raw ay tinanggal sa bisa ng naunang desisyon ng National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) noong Mayo 2009 (halos isang taon na ang nakaraan). Gusto nilang ipakitang sila ang nagmamagandang-loob dahil hindi nila kaagad na tinanggal ang mga manggagawa. Pero ito ay hindi kusang-loob kundi inobliga ng apela ng unyon (Motion for Reconsideration) sa NLRC.

Pero nang ipinagkait ng NLRC ang aming mosyon - at inangkas sa kaso ang gawa-gawang iligal strike, ibig sabihin, itinuring na welga ang aming “moving picket” - nagpasya kaming hindi na iapela ang desisyon ng NLRC sa Court Appeals hanggang sa Supreme Court. Sa kabila ng aming solidong posisyon, hindi kami kinatigan ng NLRC. Natutukso kaming magduda na ang Komisyon ay may “komisyon” mula sa Goldilocks Management.

Inasahan na namin ang ganitong desisyon ng NLRC. Kaya naman naobliga kaming pumili sa dalawang ligal na larangan: (a) ang pag-apela sa Court of Appeals hanggang sa Supreme Court, o (b) ang paglulunsad ng welga - na ginagarantiyahan ng Konstitusyon at ng Labor Code of the Philippines.

Sa dalawang opsyon, ang pinakamadali ay ang pag-apela sa Korte. Subalit mas matagal ang paghihintay ng resolusyon. Hindi ito ang pinili namin. Sapagkat inaasahan namin ang tuloy-tuloy pang pagtatanggal ng mga trabahador ng Goldilocks Management para makatipid sa labor costs at durugin ang BISIG-AGLO-BMP.

Mas komplikado at mas mahirap ang landas ng pagwewelga. Pero mas dito matitiyak namin ang tagumpay sa aming mga kahilingan sapagkat ang kinakailangan lamang tiyakin ay ang pagsuporta ng mga manggagawa upang matigil ang operasyon.

Mga kababayan! Hinihingi namin ang inyong simpatya't pag-unawa. Prayoridad din namin ang mga tagapagtangkilik ng Goldilocks. Pero hindi naman kalabisang ikunsidera namin ang aming sariling kapakanan - ang kasigurahan sa trabaho at karapatang mag-unyon at makipag-CBA na amin ding mga Konstitusyunal na karapatan.

Kung inyo pong mamarapatin, hiling namin na pansamantalang huwag tangkilikin ang Goldilocks upang maobliga ang Management na ibalik sa trabaho ang 127 manggagawa. Lalupa't pinangangambahan naming gagamit ito ng dahas laban sa aming welga. Hindi na bago ang ganitong ganting reaksyon ng Goldilocks Management. Sa welgang hinarap nito noong 1991, tatlong unyonista ang namatay at 6 ang sugatan nang paulanan ng bala ang picket line.

Pagpalain nawa tayo ng Poong Maykapal. Mabuhay ang uring manggagawa at sambayanang Pilipino!