Huwebes, Marso 11, 2010

Bukas na Liham sa Lahat ng Tagatangkilik ng Goldilocks

BUKAS NA LIHAM SA LAHAT NG TAGATANGKILIK NG GOLDILOCKS
(Sagot sa inilathala ng Goldilocks Company sa Philippine Daily Inquirer, Marso 16, 2010)

Marso 16, 2010


Mga kababayan,

Pagbati sa inyong lahat!

Marahil di na kaila sa inyo ang nagaganap na sigalot sa pagitan ng mga manggagawa ng Goldilocks at ang mga nagmamay-ari nito. Obligadong ipaliwanag namin ang mga totoong pangyayari kung bakit humantong sa pagwewelga ang manggagawa noong Marso 11, 2010.

Hindi biro ang limang taong pagpupunyagi ng mga manggagawa ng Goldilocks na magkaroon ng isang tunay na unyon sa kompanya. Dito po nagsimula ang pinakaugat na problema. Ang mga kaganapan nitong huling dalawang taon ay nagpapatunay lamang ng tunay na kulay ng may-ari, ang pagiging gahaman nito sa tubo at paggamit mismo ng batas upang yurakan ang mga karapatan ng mga manggagawa at pairalin ang kapangyarihan sa pamamagitan ng salapi.

Kung totoong desperado ang mga manggagawang hindi makipagkaisa at maging wala sa katwiran ay dapat noong 2006 pa lang ay lumikha na siya ng kaguluhan. Bago pumutok ang welga nitong Marso 2010, may dalawang magkasunod na “NOS” (Notice of Strike) ang naisampa pero di ito itinuloy dahil pumasok sa proseso ng konsilyasyon ang mga manggagawa. Ang nagtulak sa manggagawa na gawin ang pag-aaklas ay nang isakatuparan ng kompanya ng Goldilocks ang iligal na pagtatanggal sa may 127 na manggagawa noong Pebrero 8, 2010. Hindi na pinapasok sa kompanya ang mga nasabing mga manggagawa. Sa katunayan, napilitang magpiket ang mga tinanggal na manggagawa nang sumunod na mga araw. Iligal ang ginawa ng kompanya dahil matapos matanggap ang kautusan ng NLRC kaugnay sa dismissal ay agarang ipinatupad ng management ng wala pang “entry of judgment” na siyang marapat na proseso bago ipatupad ang pagtatanggal. Kabalintunaan ang pahayag ng kompanya na ang manggagawa pa ngayon ang may kasalanan na hindi nagsampa ng apila sa korte. Para saan pa ang apila sa korte na ang kautusan ay agaran nang ipinatupad.

Anila, “binigyan daw nila ng “ample time“ ang mga manggagawa para mag-apila. Pero ang katotohanan ay di nila binigyan ng “ample time” ang mga manggagawa bago ipatupad ang ginawang pagtatanggal.

Ang nakakalungkot sa ahensiya ng ating gobyerno tulad ng DOLE at NLRC, imbes kastiguhin nila ang kompanya dahil sa pambabalasubas nito sa manggagawa ay sila pa itong numero unong konsintidor at naglalabas ng mga disisyong pumapabor lamang sa mga kapitalista. Sa naging disisyon ng NLRC noong 2009, kwestyunable at nakakapagduda ang nilalaman nito; Una, pagpapatibay na walang unfair labor practice na nilabag ang Goldilocks Management, Ikalawa, binigyan ng karapatan ang natalong unyon sa Goldilocks na siyang maki-pagCBA at panghuli ay ang pag-aangat sa picket protest bilang illegal strike na batayan sa pagtatanggal sa mga manggagawa. Ang desisyong ito ay inapela ng mga manggagawa pero ito’y binastos ng management at dagliang ipinatupad. Sa katunayan, ang kompanya ay nakipag-CBA sa natalong unyon.

Kahit nakawelga, ang mga opisyales ay bukas sa pakikipag-usap. Pero likas ang katusuhan ng Kompanya. Sinasabi nila na hindi daw sila nagtanggal at gumawa ng buhol-buhol na kasinungalingan para mapagtakpan ang iligal na ginawa sa DOLE.

Sa kasaysayan ng Goldilocks sa loob ng apatnapung (40) taon, 2 matitingkad na pangyayari ang magpapatunay kung anong klaseng kompanya ito. 3 manggagawa ang pinatay sa piketlayn at anim ang nasugatan bunsod ng unang welga noong 1991. Gayundin noong 2004, hindi nabago ang ginawang nitong pagtatanggal sa mga manggagawa dahil sa panahong yon pitumpung (70) tagaluto ang kanilang iligal na tinanggal.

Mahaba na po ang sakripisyo naming mga manggagawa sa Goldilocks. Apatnapung taon naming itinaguyod upang abutin nito ang mahigit sa dalawang daang (200) puwesto sa buong kapuluan at maging sa labas ng bansa. Pero ano itong ginagawa ng Goldilocks? Lalo nitong pinalalakas ang tubo habang ang mga manggagawa nito ay pinagkakaitang mabuhay ng disente. Layon ng pagtatanggal ay mapalitan ng mga kontraktwal ang kasalukuyang manggagawa ng Goldilocks upang makatipid sa gastusin sa pasahod at benepisyo at lalo pang kumita ng limpak-limpak ang kompanya.

Mga kababayan, kami ay walang kakayanang magpa-paid ad sa mga malaganap na pahayagan, ang sa amin ay ang pagyakap sa katotohanan. Hindi namin kayang baluktutin ang batas at lalong wala kaming kakayanang manuhol ng mga tiwaling opisyal ng gobyerno. Kami ay naghahangad lamang na mabuhay ng marangal, may dignidad at karapatan.

Tatagal pa ang aming laban at ngayon pa lamang ay nagpapasalamat na kami sa lahat ng aming tagasuporta di lamang dito sa ating bansa maging sa ibayong dagat. Natutuwa kami sa mga tugon mula sa iba’t ibang sektor lalung lalo na sa mga kapwa unyon. Sa mga maralita at iba pang uring anakpawis. Sa mga panggitnang puwersa na karamihan ay nagbibigay inspirasyon sa amin sa pamamagitan ng internet, sa partikular sa facebook at friendster. Lahat kayo ay aming ipinagkakapuri dahil nanawagan kayo ng aming pagbabalik sa trabaho at mabigyang hustisya ang kalagayan naming mga manggagawa.

Ituloy po natin ang pansamantalang di pagtangkilik sa Goldilocks hangga’t di kami naibabalik sa aming trabaho!

Muli ang aming marubdob na pagpapasalamat,


127 iligal na tinanggal na manggagawa ng Goldilocks
BISIG-AGLO-BMP

Dismissal of 127 Goldilocks Workers Assailed

“Goldilocks tumitiba, Manggagawa kinakawawa!”

Dear Friends,

Today February 9, 2010, 127 workers were refused entry by the Goldilocks management. The workers were informed yesterday regarding the latest decision of the NLRC (National Labor Relations Commission) affirming their dismissal.

In turn, the workers staged a picket outside the Goldilocks Plant in Mandaluyong to protest and condemn the unjust decision.

Four years ago, the workers participated in a PCE (Petition for Certification Elections) held in February 28, 2006 as a result of the sixty (60) days freedom period after the 5-year Collective Bargaining agreement covering March 1, 2001 to February 28, 2006 between Goldilocks Bakeshop Inc., and Buklod ng mga Manggagawa sa Goldilocks Bakeshop (BUKLOD) expired. Separate petitions were filed by three groups, namely; KMG-KMM-Katipunan (Kilusan ng mga Manggagawa sa Goldilocks-Kilusan ng mga Manggagawang Makabayan), Bukluran ng Independyenteng Samahan na Itinatag sa Goldilocks (BISIG) and Obrero Pilipino-Goldilocks Employees Association (Obrero-GOLDEA).Being the incumbent union, BUKLOD was considered as forced intervenor for being the incumbent union.

It was a rough sailing for the workers since the management in collusion with the incumbent union (BUKLOD) questioned the petition filed by Obrero-GOLDEA. On the other hand, BUKLOD, filed a petition to cancel BISIG’s certificate of registration.

On May 10, 2006, DOLE-NCR Med-Arbiter Catherine Z. Licaros issued an order directing the conduct of certification of election. In response to the decision, both BUKLOD and Obrero appealed the decision and argued that BISIG and KMG-KMM-Katipunan should be excluded as among the choices in the certification election.

But a resolution was released in September 11, 2006 issued by Undersecretary Luzviminda Padilla dismissing the appeal. Subsequently, an entry of judgment was issued on November 14, 2006 by the Bureau of Labor Relations (BLR) Director Rebecca Chato. The Certification election was finally conducted on March 19, 2007 with the following results;

KMG-KMM-Katipunan---------334
BISIG--------------------------517
OBRERO------------------------44
BUKLOD-----------------------581
NO UNION----------------------15
__________________________
TOTAL 1491

Because no union garnered the fifty percent plus one (50% plus 1) ruling in the certification election between BUKLOD and BISIG and after hearings on the manifestation, run-off election was scheduled on August 6, 2007 and the result was;

BISIG--------------------------------- 764
BUKLOD------------------------------653
Spoiled----------------------------------38
Segregated/Challenged Votes----------202
____________________________
Total Votes: 1,657

Buklod filed a protest in the run-off election and manifested that the segregated ballot must be counted.

On March 17, 2008, seven months later, BISIG was certified as the sole and exclusive bargaining representative of rank and file employees thru the decision issued by Med-Arbiter Atty. Alma Magdaraog-Alma. The decision was appealed by BUKLOD before the office of the Secretary;

Surprisingly on April 10, 2008, the Court of Appeal reinstated the August 11, 2006 Resolution of the then Bureau of Labor Relation OIC-Director Henry Parel delisting BISIG from the rooster of legitimate labor organizations. BISIG in turn, immediately filed a motion for reconsideration.

On April 16, 2008, BISIG sent a letter to the Goldilocks Management requesting the latter to commence the collective bargaining negotiation but the management ignored the said letter request. BISIG filed a (NOS) Notice of Strike on April 24, 2008 on the issue of discrimination, harassments and other related issues.

On May 20,2008, the Goldilocks company responded by filing a petition for assumption jurisdiction or Certification for Compulsory Arbitration for the (NOS) Notice of Strike of BISIG dated April 24, 2008. Undersecretary Lourdes Transmonte, then acting Secretary issued a Certificate Order dated May 26, 2008 certifying the labor dispute to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) for compulsory arbitration. The said order was received by BISIG on May 29, 2008.

The conciliation before the NCMB (National Conciliation And Mediation Board, both the Goldilocks Bakeshop Inc representative and BISIG leaders entered into agreement dated June 11, 2008 and agreed to await the office of the (BLR)- Office of the Sec (Osec) will undertake in conjunction with the labor dispute at bench specifically, the issue on Certification election. Additionally, the Union hereby withdraws the instant labor dispute for the sake of industrial peace”.

Days earlier prior to conciliation, BISIG affiliated to AGLO (Association of Genuine Labor Organization) and on June 12, 2008, the Department of Labor and Employment-National Capital Region (DOLE-NCR) issued Certificate of Creation of Local Chapter with Certification No PFC-028-2008-CC.

On June 16, 2008, BISIG filed its manifestation with motion to dismiss before the NLRC, praying that the certified case be dismissed in view of BISIG’s withdrawal of its Notice of Strike dated April 24, 2008.

On July 1, 2008, BISIG filed another NOS (Notice of Strike) on the following grounds; 1.Unfair labor practice, 2. Union Busting and other related cases.

On July 8, 2008, Undersecretary Romeo Lagman, by authority of the Secretary, issued a Resolution affirming BISIG’s certification as an exclusive bargaining representative of Goldilocks Bakeshop Inc., rank and file workers and employees.

On July 11, 2008, the management filed its Manifestation with Motion to Subsume before the Office of DOLE Secretary.

On October 13, 2008, three months later, BISIG filed its third Notice of Strike, this time around the grounds were as follows; 1. Unfair labor practice (Refusal to Bargain Collectively) 2. Illegal Suspension, 3. Unjust transfer of Goldilocks SM Cubao Branch to Provinces, 4. Discrimination (selective P13.00 wage increase) and others.

On October 31, 2008, DOLE Secretary Mariano Roque certified the October 13, 2008 BISIG Notice of Strike to Compulsory Arbitration before the NLRC;

The certified Notice of Strike (NOS) was raffled to NLRC Sixth Division composed of Commissioner Nieves Vivar-de Castro (ponente), Commissioner Benedicto R. Palacol (Presiding Commissioner) and Commissioner Isabel G. Panganiban-Ortiguera.

On May 28, 2009, almost seven months later, the NLRC came up with the decision penned by Commissioner Nieves Vivar-de Castro on the issues contained in the Notice of Strike. The decision was promulgated as follows;

1. Ordering Goldilocks to commence collective bargaining negotiation with BUKLOD (the losing union in the certification election)- this is a blatant disregard of what is the rule of law negating the existence of a duly certified bargaining agent, the BISIG-AGLO.
2. Sustaining the legality of the penalty of suspension on Wilson Dy and six other officers, leaders and members of BISIG-AGLO.- this is an outright non recognition of the violations incurred by the Goldilocks Management.
3. Declaring Joel Lachica and four (4) others to have been validly dismissed from employment- affirming the Management not guilty of unfair labor practice.
4. Declaring the demonstration and picketing of more than 120 workers and employees after office hours and eight hours work conducted on May 20 and 27, 2008 to be illegal strike and imposing the following penalties;
a. For having participated in the illegal strikes, the 17 Union officers and Board members are deemed to have lost their employment.
b. For having committed illegal activities during illegal strikes, the one hundred four (104) Union members are deemed terminated from employment.
c. Ordering Goldilocks to grant financial assistance to the terminated Union members only in an amount equivalent to half month pay per year of service as a measure of social justice.

The decision that was promulgated was unusually hand carried by an NLRC employee a day after the promulgation effected last May 27, 2009 to the office of Miralles and Associates Law Office, a far cry from the NLRC tradition where decisions are being sent thru registered mail.

Another questionable decision made was on the case of illegal strike. To where did the NLRC apply an illegal strike when no strike ever took place. Indeed, there were 3 attempts on the Notices of Strike but all these were assumed jurisdiction by the office of the Secretary thereby averting the supposed strike to take place. Only in the Philippines where you exercise your freedom to picket during break time but now constitute as an illegal strike. A “brilliant” decision penned by an equally brilliant commissioner in the person of Commissioner Nieves De Castro.

Yesterday, February 8, 2010, for over eight months now, the NLRC gave its final blow and reaffirmed the dismissal of the 127 union members of the BISIG Labor Union. This time, the decision focused on the illegality of the strike that became the basis of the dismissal. A strike that never took place.

2010 would be a bleak picture for the 127 families of Goldilocks workers and employees. This is the grim reality of our previous slogan, “Goldilocks tumitiba, Manggagawa kinakawawa”. We want to let the whole world know that the Goldilocks Company continues to grow but not their workers.

Our plight is totally unthinkable, the rule of law applies only to those who have power and money and not to people like ours. In our case, there’s no truth on the saying that for those who have less in life should enjoy more in law.

We are deeply saddened of our situation and to our family, our children and our future. There are companies in the Philippines like Goldilocks. We don’t want our case to become a precedent that would be detrimental to other workers and their families.

Please join us in our crusade to fight not only to ourselves but to the Filipino workers. We welcome your support in our struggle. We still do not lose hope. We will continue our fight in all fronts. In turn, we are seeking your support in whatever way you can. These are the ways where you can be of help;

1. Giving material and financial support to our campaign. (We will later provide details of our bank account)
2. You should think twice eating in Goldilocks branches/outlets. The more you patronize the more you support greedy capitalists.
3. Inform all your relatives, friends here in the Philippines and abroad not to patronize anymore Goldilocks. Always remember our slogan, “Goldilocks tumitiba, Manggagawa kinakawawa”.
4. If you cannot avoid eating in their outlets, at least minimize your patronage.
5. Petition all scrupulous and corrupt government officials in the mold of Commissioners De Castro, Ortiguera and Palacol.
6. Support and join our protest activities.
7. Write protest letters to DOLE, NLRC and related government offices and institution and to the Goldilocks management through their branches and offices. You can directly mail your letter or personally deliver your letter to Goldilocks outlets/branches.
8. Propagate our issue and enjoin everyone to become supporters of Goldilocks workers.


In the pursuit of justice for the Filipino workers,

127 dismissed Goldilocks workers and employees